About Us

Name: J-GOP
Email: moreinfo@j-gop.org Biography
Name: KarenKataline
Email: Karen@KarenKataline.com
Name: Dan
Email: dan@dankopelman.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Advisor Says Obama Misused "Undivided" Jerusalem

Reuters reported yesterday that Sen. Barack Obama's Middle East Advisor, Amb. Daniel Kurtzer, said Obama misused the word "undivided" regarding Jerusalem during the presumptive Democratic nominee's June 4 AIPAC speech. Kurtzer goes on to argue that Obama is not "naïve" on foreign policy.

"Obama advisors might call it a 'misuse,' but in reality, it's nothing more than a flip-flop. Either way, the stakes for Israel are too high for America's next commander-in-chief to lack basic knowledge of the Middle East," said Republican Jewish Coalition Executive Director Matt Brooks. "Interestingly, Ambassador Kurtzer's comments ignore the extensive staff work and policy vetting that went into writing the speech. Did Ambassador Kurtzer not see a copy of the speech prior to its being given?"

During his speech to AIPAC, Obama said: "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided." Twenty-four hours later, following protests from Palestinian and Hamas government officials, Obama reversed his statement telling CNN: "Obviously, it's going to be up to the parties to negotiate a range of these issues. And Jerusalem will be a part of these negotiations."

Reuters reported: "Democrat Barack Obama misused a 'code word' in Middle East politics when he said Jerusalem should be Israel's 'undivided' capital but that does not mean he is naive on foreign policy, [Kurtzer] said on Tuesday."

"By misunderstanding the significance of an 'undivided' Jerusalem, and by not anticipating the implications of a 24-hour position flip-flop, Senator Obama once again demonstrated that he is not ready for prime time. His naïvete about the Middle East is extremely troubling," said Brooks. "These are not the qualities the Jewish community is looking for in America's next commander-in-chief."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Website Takes Down Antisemitic Post

There's something fishy about antisemitism comments that are being made within the Obama campaign that continues to rear it's ugly head. The latest incident involves an antisemitic post that was discovered on Obama's campaign website last week. After it was exposed, the Obama campaign quickly pulled down the shockingly antisemitic blog post that remained there for more than two months.

And guess what? They’re also now blocking Google’s cache from saving their pages. And they’ve also removed their pages from the Internet Archive and the Coral archives.

They’re running scared, and they’re trying to make sure that when they throw a post down the memory hole, it stays there.

But they still have an awful lot of cleaning up to do.
The post on Obama's site discussed how "The Jewish Lobby Works". Here is how the Little Green Footballs blog site had reported this post as of last Sunday:

At the Official Obama Site: 'How the Jewish Lobby Works'

Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:08:47 am PST

Here’s yet another disgusting antisemitic page at the official Barack Obama campaign web site, by a group calling itself “Socialists for Obama.” This group of Jew-haters has apparently been at his site since April, and there are numerous comments from Obama supporters that are indistinguishable from the hate speech you’ll find at neo-Nazi sites: Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In | Socialists for Obama: How the jewish lobby works.

There’s something deeply wrong with a presidential candidate who attracts so many of these hateful psychotics. Read the comments; you just won’t believe what is allowed to be posted at Barack Obama’s web site. (Unfortunately it is now down, so we can't link to it).
 
You'll never hear about this latest incident on the mainstream media, but it's sad that so many liberal Jews continue to drink from the media Kool-Aid that is clearly in the tank for Obama. It's just a question of time before another one of these antisemitic rants becomes public and shakes his campaign to its core. It certainly makes one question the sincerity of the Pro-Israeli statements that were said at the recent AIPAC conference.
 
Are you paying attention liberal Democrat Jews? Wake up!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's "Undivided" Jerusalem

On Wednesday, Barack Obama committed that "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided" in his speech before the AIPAC policy conference. On Thursday, Barack Obama backtracked on this position and reversed it. Following criticism from Palestinian and Hamas officials, Barack Obama on Thursday announced in an interview with CNN's Candy Crowley that "obviously, it's going to be up to the parties to negotiate a range of these issues. And Jerusalem will be a part of these negotiations."

According to Republican Jewish Coalition President Matt Brooks, "Barack Obama's attempt to use buzzwords to impress pro-Israel leaders has already backfired. Barack Obama's reversal on Jerusalem, 24 hours after his AIPAC speech, demonstrates why the Jewish community has doubts and fears about an Obama presidency."
 
Barack Obama's retreat demonstrates that Senator Obama lacks the resolve and leadership necessary to protect America and Israel from the serious threats we face. Worst of all, the impression that Barack Obama changed this position because of pressure by Hamas officials sends all the wrong messages that a President Obama will back off pro-Israel positions when Hamas protests. Yet again, Barack Obama demonstrates why the Jewish community does not trust Barack Obama to keep America and Israel safe and secure.
 
It also provides another reason why Jewish voters concerned with the future of U.S./Israeli relations under a Democrat administration should be wary about an Obama presidency.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iran Threat Key to Jewish Voters in November

John McCain's speech before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) drew a standing ovation and illustrates how Iran, more than the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, has emerged as the defining issue for candidates wooing Jewish-American voters.
 
Sen. McCain sought to set down a political marker with Jewish voters by pledging a hard line on Iran and a commitment to many of the policies AIPAC has been promoting. The American lobbying body has particularly pushed for an international divestment campaign from companies doing business in Iran, while also seeking more unilateral U.S. sanctions against Iranian state institutions, such as the central bank.

The Arizona senator also sought to again define his likely Democratic opponent for the presidency, Sen. Obama, as weak on Iran and naïve for announcing his willingness to negotiate directly with Tehran's leaders.

"We hear talk of a meeting with the Iranian leadership offered up as if it were some sudden inspiration, a bold new idea," Sen. McCain said, noting that the Clinton administration had also attempted to engage Tehran. "Yet it's hard to see what such a summit...would actually gain, except an earful of anti-Semitic rants."

AIPAC and other Jewish-American organizations have identified Iran as a threat to Israel's existence. Tehran's efforts to develop nuclear technologies are seen as directly targeted at Israel, fueled by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's calls to "erase" the Jewish state from the map. Mr. Ahmadinejad Monday said the country "has reached the end of its function and will soon disappear off the geographical domain," Iran's IRNA news agency reported.

Both Republicans and Democrats view Jewish-Americans as key swing voters in the presidential election. Jewish-Americans have leaned toward Democrats due to their liberal stances on domestic issues, such as abortion and immigration. But Sen. McCain's backers believe their candidate's hard-line approach to securing Israel could cause some Jewish-Americans to cross party lines. In fact early estimates from several leading pollsters show that the Jewish Republican vote could reach as high as it was in 1984, when 32% voted to re-elect President Ronald Reagan.

The strategy to woo Jewish voters could be crucial in Florida, according to Adam Hasner, the majority leader in the state's House of Representatives, who is leading the McCain campaign's Jewish outreach there.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Does Obama Keep McPeak?

The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) reiterated its position today that Sen. Barack Obama must remove Gen. Merrill "Tony" McPeak as national campaign co-chairman and military advisor.

"General McPeak has espoused the view that American Jewry is to blame for the lack of progress in the Middle East peace talks. Today, General McPeak said that he supports the same dangerous and naïve foreign policy approach as Senator Obama. It is unfortunate and disappointing that Senator Obama continues to keep General McPeak as an official advisor to his campaign when McPeak has clearly expressed not so veiled anti-Semitic bias," said RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks.

In a Washington Times article today, Gen. McPeak said that "the whole idea that we shouldn't talk to the Cubans, or the North Koreans or the Iranians because they're not nice boys. I would think by now people would have figured out that is not helpful... This whole idea that diplomacy is attending cocktail parties with your best friends, that's kind of dumb."

In a 2003 interview with The Oregonian, Gen. McPeak was asked whether the problem in solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict originated with the White House or the State Department. McPeak replied, "New York City. Miami. We have a large vote -- vote, here in favor of Israel. And no politician wants to run against it." On March 26, 2008, McPeak told the same paper that he "stood by his position that U.S. policy in the Mideast is influenced by pro-Israeli voters."

"Rather than putting the blame where it belongs -- on the Palestinian leadership and their continued reliance on terror, General McPeak finds it more convenient to blame American Jewry and their perceived influence. General McPeak blamed American Jews in 2003 and he blames them still today. It is painfully clear he does not understand the offensive nature of these comments. The Jewish community should be wary when Senator Obama continues to seek advice from advisors like General McPeak. It begs the question: why Obama doesn't sever ties with them? " said Brooks.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bonior Latest Anti-Israel Obama Campaign Official

The Republican Jewish Coalition today responded to the announcement that former Rep. David Bonior will be representing the Obama campaign at the Democratic National Committee meeting this weekend in Washington, D.C. As a Congressman, David Bonior was known for his strong opposition to pro-Israel policies, being called by some "the biggest supporter of the anti-Israel Arab lobby in Congress." The RJC cited Bonior as the latest in a string of advisors and campaign officials to Barack Obama that harbor anti-Israel views.

"Barack Obama's path to strengthening ties with the Jewish community is severely blocked when appointing an anti-Israel figure like David Bonior. While in Congress, Bonior refused to stand by Israel after repeated terrorist attacks, was known as a stalwart opponent to Israel, and is now a representative for Barack Obama. Bonior's appointment is the latest in a series that raises serious questions and doubts about Barack Obama's positions and judgments on the Middle East."

During his Congressional career, David Bonior repeatedly opposed pro-Israel legislation. In 1997, David Bonior was one of 15 Congressmen who signed a letter asking then-President Clinton to pressure Israelis into making concessions to the Palestinians. In 2002, David Bonior was one of only 21 Congressmen who opposed H.R. 392, which publicly affirmed Congress's support of Israel's right to self-defense and called for the dismantling of the Palestinian terrorist infrastructure. In 1990, David Bonior was one of only 34 Congressman to vote against a measure naming Jerusalem as the united capital of Israel. In 1989, Bonior was one of six House members to vote against a bill that prevented US funds from going to UN entities that granted the PLO membership. Throughout his career, Bonior repeatedly opposed US aid to Israel and supported arms sales to Arab states opposed to Israel's existence.

"The appointment of yet another anti-Israel advisor like David Bonior to represent Barack Obama speaks volumes to the Jewish community. The pattern including Tony McPeak, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Robert Malley continues with this appointment. It's no wonder the Jewish community remains deeply skeptical and troubled by Barack Obama."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Young Jewish Republican Recognized By Local Radio Station

A hearty congratulations goes out to our treasurer Evan Holz and his family for their son Daniel who was awarded 630KHOWs MVP award on the Dan Caplis and Craig Silverman radio talk show which aired late Friday afternoon May 23rd. Daniel was nominated by our very own former J-GOP President Karen Kataline.
 
Daniel took it upon himself to organize his 6th grade class for a project to send care packages to our troops in Iraq. With the help of his classmates and teacher, Daniel’s class put together 5 large boxes which included items that were needed and wanted by our soldiers. The packages also included letters written by all of Daniel’s classmates.

Daniel had been communicating with another solider in Iraq who told him what the troops wanted including items such as toiletries and footballs among a host of additional items. In addition, the PTSA from Westwood Elementary School in Arvada helped with postage which was substantial.

Craig Silverman read a letter from Lieutenant Colonel Steve Mariano of the job that Daniel did toward this project:

“I think you’re going to be a great Marine. If you could organize a project like this, leading your classmates in the effort, and put a smile on the face of our warriors, then I’m sure you have what it takes.”

If you missed hearing the show, you can listen or download a copy of the show from the KHOW.com website. Be sure to forward to the last 15 minutes of this segment to hear his interview.

This project is in addition Daniel’s ongoing work with Operation Gratitude for the past 5 years, where he helps in an annual charity drive each Christmas with Toys for Tots.

It gives us great pleasure to see Daniel setting an excellent example for his fellow classmates in supporting our troops and reinforcing the concept of tzedukah as a young Jewish Republican.

Thank you Daniel!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RJC Releases Ad in Advance of Obama's Synagogue Visit

In advance of Sen. Barack Obama's remarks to B'nai Torah Congregation in Boca Raton, Florida, the Republican Jewish Coalition today released a new advertisement that will run in three major newspapers in South Florida.

The ad will run on Thursday, May 22 in the Palm Beach Post, Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel and the Boca Raton News. The ad raises three important questions that the American Jewish community has regarding statements and positions taken by Sen. Obama. Additionally, the ad underscores Sen. Obama's lack of experience and dangerously naïve foreign policy thinking -- concerns that have caused real problems for the Illinois senator in the American Jewish community.

The three questions asked of Sen. Obama are:

In an interview, you called for a summit of Muslim nations, including Iran and Syria, but excluding Israel. Why? (Reuters, 1/30/08)

One of your top advisors, Tony McPeak, placed blame on Miami and NY Jews for the failure of the Middle East peace process yet he remains in this role. Why? (The Oregonian, 3/27/03)

You were a board member of a foundation that funded, during your tenure, the Arab American Action Network, a pro-Palestinian organization. Why? (LA Times, 4/10/08)
Sen. Obama's problems in the American Jewish community were evident in the April Gallup poll data where he received only 61% of the Jewish vote -- a near-historic low for Democrats. Conversely, the poll showed Sen. John McCain receiving 31% and continuing the inroads made by the GOP among Jewish voters.

"Our hope is that Senator Obama will use this opportunity in Florida to give full and complete answers to these critical questions and concerns," said RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama courts Jewish Vote as Doubts Persist

Jews make up less than 2 percent of the U.S. population, but they are well-organized, politically active and concentrated in a handful of key states, including classic swing states such as New Jersey and Florida. In some ways, Obama would seem a natural fit for the Jewish community, which is disproportionately Democratic, liberal and pro-civil rights. And many Jews have indeed been quick to embrace Obama.

But others have raised questions. "Since we don't have a lifetime of experience with him, we need to know who he is, this man who has suddenly come on the scene, who is very exciting, a good speaker and handles himself beautifully," said New York Assemblyman
Dov Hikind. "We don't want to be fooled by these things that at the end of the day don't matter that much."
Among the concerns for some is Obama's professed willingness to talk with dictators, presumably including enemies of Israel like Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Some have complained that Obama is getting foreign policy advice from experts such as Robert Malley and Zbigniew Brzezinski, who are seen as less friendly to Israel, though Obama's campaign says the two are merely among hundreds of people who have offered counsel. Earlier this month, Malley severed his ties to the Obama campaign.

More broadly, some Jews, fairly or not, are doubtless uneasy with Obama's connections to the Muslim world. Some of his family members were Muslim, he lived in Indonesia as a child, and he has befriended such controversial figures as Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi.

"He speaks with extraordinarily empty platitudes about the Middle East," said Herbert London, president of the conservative Hudson Institute, who is Jewish. Of Obama's openness to talking with dictators, London is contemptuous: "That is almost child's play. It is adolescent talk you might hear from a 14-year-old."

There have long been tensions between the Jewish and African-American communities, and those were exacerbated by the emergence of Wright, Obama's pastor. "There's this relationship with a guy who not only said 'God damn America' but also said 'Zionism is racism'—that is anti-Semitism," said Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith.
Now national GOP leaders seem to be taking up the cause more openly. McCain recently highlighted a Hamas official's comment that he would welcome an Obama presidency. House Minority Leader Boehner accused Obama of calling Israel a "sore" on American's foreign policy, a somewhat brazen misrepresentation of Obama's comments in a May 12 interview.
Assuming Obama locks up the Democratic nomination, few believe he would lose the Jewish vote to McCain; Jews have not favored the Republican nominee over the Democrat since 1920, and that was because 38 percent of Jews went even further left and voted for Socialist Eugene Debs. In the 2004 election, Democrat John Kerry won 76 percent of the Jewish vote.

The question, rather, is whether McCain—because of his own independent streak, as well as doubts about Obama—can make significant inroads. "My sense is that in the end, [Jewish] liberalism will overcome even commitment to Israel," said London of the Hudson Institute. "I'm Jewish, quite obviously, and when I started to vote for Republicans many years ago my mother described it as a shandeh, a sin. That's the view in the Jewish community."
 
Then again, even some of the strictest traditions can change. After all, the thought that a woman could become an ordained rabbi was considered an unthinkable shandeh fifty years ago. If G-d can show his patience for the "stiff-necked" Jewish people in the Torah, then there's always hope that the Jewish voter will "see the light" and vote Republican this time around.
 
We shall see.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama & Israel: Why So Defensive?

Why when Barack Obama hears the word 'appeasement' does he think it applies to him?  Why when it comes to standing with Israel is Barack Obama so defensive? 
 
Wasn't it Barack Obama's promise to meet with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad that causes great nervousness in the Jewish community? Hillary Clinton and George W. Bush agree -- Barack Obama's policies of direct presidential negotiations with hostile regimes, without precondition, is naïve and irresponsible.
 
Barack Obama's shaky grasp of Middle East policy and repeated vows to meet with state sponsors of terrorism are alarming.  Barack Obama has surrounded himself with advisors, past and present, like Gen. Merrill McPeak, Robert Malley, Congressman Jim Moran, Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Zbigniew Brzezinski, who choose to blame America's Jewish community for the problems in the Middle East. 
It's no wonder Hamas has endorsed Barack Obama.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jewish Voters Doubt in Obama is Good for McCain

Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) Executive Director Matt Brooks issued the followed statement today:

"The just released Gallup poll of Jewish voters is another important indicator of the ongoing troubles Barack Obama has with Jewish voters. In the poll of Jewish voters (conducted April 1-30), it showed Obama getting only 61% of the Jewish vote against John McCain (32%). By comparison, in 2004, John Kerry received 75% of the Jewish vote and George W. Bush received 25%. The recent polling numbers demonstrate Obama's weakness among Jewish voters. This data comes on the heels of the exit poll data from the Democratic primary in Pennsylvania. Hillary Clinton beat Obama among Jewish voters 62% - 38%," said Brooks.

"These results show that the American Jewish community is troubled by what they know of Barack Obama, his views and his positions. The RJC remains confident that John McCain will continue the trend of the GOP making inroads among Jewish voters."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Story of a Female Schindler

Irena Sendler turned ninety-seven in 2007. Mrs. Sendler, a Polish woman, saved 2,500 Jewish children during the Holocaust.

Though she received the Yad Vashem medal for the Righteous Among the Nations in 1965, Irena Sendler's story was virtually unknown. But in 1999 the silence was broken by some unlikely candidates: four Protestant high-school girls in rural Kansas. The girls were looking for a subject for the Kansas State National History Day competition. Their teacher, Norm Conard, gave them a short paragraph about Mrs. Sendler, from a 1994 U.S. News & World Report story, "The Other Schindlers." Mr. Conard thought the figures were mistaken. After all, no one had ever heard of this woman; Schindler, who was so famous, had rescued 1,000 Jews. 250 children seemed more likely than 2,500.

Mrs. Sendler, code name "Jolanta," smuggled 2,500 children out of the Warsaw Ghetto during the last three months before its liquidation. She found a home for each child. Each was given a new name and a new identity as a Christian. Others were saving Jewish children, too, but many of those children were saved only in body; tragically, they disappeared from the Jewish people. Irena did all she could to ensure that "her children" would have a future as part of their own people.

Irena Sendler was born in 1910 in Otwock, some 15 miles southeast of Warsaw. Her father, a physician and one of the first Polish Socialists, raised her to respect and love people regardless of their ethnicity or social status. Many of his patients were poor Jews. When a typhus epidemic broke out in 1917, he was the only doctor who stayed in the area. He contracted the disease. His dying words to seven-year-old Irena were, "If you see someone drowning, you must jump in and try to save them, even if you don't know how to swim."

You can read the entire story of this amazing woman and her quest for saving Jewish children during the Holocaust by following this link.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Japanese View of the Palestinians

By Yashiko Sagamori

If you are so sure that "Palestine, the country, goes back through most of recorded history", I expect you to be able to answer a few basic questions about that country of Palestine:
When was it founded and by whom?
What were its borders?
What was its capital?
What were its major cities?
What constituted the basis of its economy?
What was its form of government?
Can you name at least one Palestinian leader before Arafat?
Was Palestine ever recognized by a country whose existence, at that time or now, leaves no room for interpretation?
What was the language of the country of Palestine?
What was the prevalent religion of the country of Palestine?
What was the name of its currency? Choose any date in history and tell what was the approximate exchange rate of the Palestinian monetary unit against the US dollar, German mark, GB pound, Japanese yen, or Chinese yuan on that date.
And, finally, since there is no such country today, what caused its demise and when did it occur?
You are lamenting the "low sinking" of a "once proud" nation. Please tell me, when exactly was that "nation" proud and what was it so proud of?
And here is the least sarcastic question of all: If the people you mistakenly call "Palestinians" are anything but generic Arabs collected from all over -- or thrown out of -- the Arab world, if they really have a genuine ethnic identity that gives them right for self-determination, why did they never try to become independent until Arabs suffered their devastating defeat in the Six Day War?
I hope you avoid the temptation to trace the modern day "Palestinians" to the Biblical Philistines: substituting etymology for history won't work here.
The truth should be obvious to everyone who wants to know it. Arab countries have never abandoned the dream of destroying Israel; they still cherish it today. Having time and again failed to achieve their evil goal with military means, they decided to fight Israel by proxy. For that purpose, they created a terrorist organization, cynically called it "the Palestinian people" and installed it in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. How else can you explain the refusal by Jordan and Egypt to unconditionally accept back the "West Bank" and Gaza, respectively?
The fact is, Arabs populating Gaza, Judea, and Samaria have much less claim to nationhood than that Indian tribe that successfully emerged in Connecticut with the purpose of starting a tax-exempt casino: at least that tribe had a constructive goal that motivated them.
 
The so called "Palestinians" have only one motivation: the destruction of Israel, and in my book that is not sufficient to consider them a nation" -- or anything else except what they really are: a terrorist organization that will one day be dismantled.
In fact, there is only one way to achieve peace in the Middle East. Arab countries must acknowledge and accept their defeat in their war against Israel and, as the losing side should, pay Israel reparations for the more than 50 years of devastation they have visited on it. The most appropriate form of such reparations would be the removal of their terrorist organization from the land of Israel and accepting Israel's ancient sovereignty over Gaza, Judea, and Samaria.
That will mark the end of the Palestinian people. What are you saying again was its beginning?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Watch out for Renewed Iran-Egypt Ties

A warming relationship between Egypt and Iran will mean an easier road for Iran's client Hamas.

Egypt and Iran joined forces in mid-April at the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) meeting in Cape Town, South Africa, to propose the adoption of a pro-Palestinian statement,
Iranian news agencies report. The proposal held no authority, and the IPU is not an organization that commands even a modicum of international respect. But, when Egypt and Iran work together in any capacity, there is cause for concern.

The acrimony between Iran and Egypt stretches far beyond the much-publicized Shiite-Sunni tensions. After the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the mullahs of Tehran, then led by Ayatollah Khomeini, renounced all ties with Egypt when Cairo provided asylum to the deposed Iranian Shah, Mohamed Reza Pahlavi. Ties worsened further after Egypt inked a peace deal with the state of Israel.

Relations worsened further still with the outbreak of the Iran-Iraq War in 1980, as Egypt backed its Sunni brothers in Iraq. In response, after the 1981 assassination of Egyptian president Anwar Sadat, Iran celebrated the occasion with a four-story mural on a large building in the Iranian capital that lionized Khaled Islambouli, the Islamic extremist who mowed down Sadat in cold blood with a hail of machine gun bullets.

Cairo and Tehran remained at odds for the next 30 years. Tehran, the rogue state, continued to test the patience of Washington policy makers, while Egypt, a valuable U.S. ally, reaped a multibillion dollar windfall in foreign aid for merely maintaining a frigid peace with Israel. Indeed, Egypt and Iran appeared to hold diametrically opposed positions on U.S. policy in the Middle East.

The rift between the two countries came into sharp relief amidst the crisis surrounding the ongoing violence in post-Saddam Iraq. Sunni Egypt grew alarmed over Iran's influence among Iraq's radical Shiites, and the potential for that influence to spread through the "Shiite Crescent" from Iran to Lebanon. President Husni Mubarak's regime grew even more alarmed over Iran's influence in Palestinian affairs. Iran, by sponsoring the violent 2006 coup that brought Hamas to power in Gaza, brought instability to Egypt's doorstep.

Responding to reports of Hamas operatives training at military camps run by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Egypt worked quietly in 2006 and 2007 to bolster Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah faction. Reports emerged that Cairo began training at least one Fatah battalion to be stationed in the Gaza Strip.

In late 2007, though, the Iran-Egypt dynamic shifted dramatically. As Israel and the U.S. — with the backing of the international community — moved to isolate Hamas in Gaza, representatives from Cairo and Iran began to meet frequently.

Even as Iran continued to supply weapons to Hamas through subterranean tunnels it helped build and finance between the Sinai Peninsula and southern Gaza, the mullahs publicly implored the Arab world to ease the isolation of Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The Egyptian trade minister visited Iran on an official visit, and the speaker of the Iranian parliament, the Majles, came to Egypt for high-level talks.

Did Iran effectively lobby Egypt? Questions arise over the way in which the Mubarak regime allowed Palestinians to stream into the Sinai Peninsula after the Hamas breach of the Gaza-Egypt border in late January 2008. According to the Egyptian daily al-Masry al-Youm, for 12 days the Egyptians allowed Palestinians to cross the border freely and without documentation, effectively ending the siege of Gaza. Given the chaos, it would have been possible for these individuals to smuggle additional weaponry across the border into Gaza for a terrorist attack.

It quickly became clear that the fate of Hamas, Iran's new favorite client, was in Egypt's hands. The mullahs reached out to Cairo through the Iranian Foreign Ministry, which offered Egypt "assistance" and funds to help "control" the border.

Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad — reviled in Israel for threatening to wipe the Jewish state "off the map" — soon made a direct call to Husni Mubarak, offering to restore ties between the two countries, while pleading for aid to Hamas. "The time is ripe for assisting the Palestinians to survive this intolerable situation," Ahmadinejad reported told his Egyptian counterpart.

Ali Asghar Mohammadi, a high-ranking Iranian diplomat, also visited Cairo to discuss the world sanctions isolating Hamas in Gaza. Iran's news agency and television confirmed that discussions were ongoing, publicly signaling that ties could be renewed.

When Omar Suleiman, Egypt's top spy, made plans to visit Israel in February 2008, it was clear that he held the key to enforcing sanctions against Hamas or allowing it to arm. Iran has since made a concerted effort to influence Egypt policy on how to police its crucial seven-mile border separating Egypt from Gaza. Indeed, Iran knows that Egypt will determine whether or not Hamas stocks up on arms for its next Iran-sponsored conflict with Israel.

According to recent news reports, Mubarak is still wary of Iran's growing influence in the region. Moreover, Egyptians widely believe that the enmity between the two countries is too entrenched to overcome. Nonetheless, there is cause for concern. Iran continues to lobby Egypt on behalf of Hamas.

This article was courtesy of Jonathan Schanzer, a former terrorism analyst for the U.S. Treasury Department, is director of policy for the Jewish Policy Center and author of the forthcoming Hamas vs. Fatah: The Struggle for Palestine.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Wreck Of the Edmund Obama

This post comes courtesy of the website Scriptoriumdaily.com:
 
Hugh Hewitt suggests that the Obama campaign is taking on water fast. He compares it to the wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald. The site has freely borrowed from the famous song about that wreck to eulogize the moment:
 
The legend lives on from the Chippewa on down
Of the Senator they called ‘Chelsea’s Mommy’
That she, it is said, never gives up her dead
When the skies of November turn gloomy
With a load of Wright rant twenty-six thousand words more
Ah how his mentor of yore made Obama’s words sound empty.
That young man and true was a bone to be chewed
When the gales of November came early.

The man was the pride of the Daily Kos side
Coming back from some mill with John Edwards
As the big politicos go, he was bigger than most
With a crew and a message well seasoned
Concluding some terms with a couple of Rezko firms
So they left fully loaded for Cleveland
At 3 AM one night when the telephone rang
Could Ohio bitter enders leave them reelin’?

The news on the wires made a tattle-tale sound
And a wave broke over the railing
And every man knew, as the captain did too,
T’was the witch of November come stealin’.
Pennsylvania came late and McCain had to wait
When the Clintons of November came slashin’.
When Indiana came it was Rev Wright again
His the voice of a hurricane spewing and windy.

When Carolina came, the old gov’nor came on deck sayin’.
Fellas, it’s too rough to endorse ya.
At Seven P.M. a main demographic caved in, he said
Fellas, it’s been good t’know ya
The Senator opined he had water comin’ in
And the Obama ship and crew was in peril.
And later that night when his negatives went outta sight
Came the wreck of the Edmund Obama.

Does any one know where the love of Gen Y goes
When the press turns the minutes to hours?
The pundits all say they’d have made Chesapeake Bay
If they’d put Reverend Wright far behind him.
They might have split up and so not have capsized;
Instead he pressed on and took water.
And all that remains is the faces and the names
On the Internet lists he was compiling.

Lake Huron rolls, Superior sings
In the rooms of her ice-water mansion.
Old Michigan steams like a young man’s dreams;
The islands and bays are for sportsmen.
And farther below Lake Ontario
Takes in what Lake Erie can send her,
And the politicos go there as the pundits all know
Cause the electoral votes in November are needed.

In a cavernous hall in Chicago he stayed,
In Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s Cathedral.
The pastor spoke out around forty-nine times
For each state where he hurt young Obama.
The legend lives on from the Chippewa on down
Of the big pol they call ‘Chelsea’s Mommy’.
Clinton, they said, never gives up her dead
When the gales of November come early!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive