About Us

Name: J-GOP
Email: moreinfo@j-gop.org Biography
Name: KarenKataline
Email: Karen@KarenKataline.com
Name: Dan
Email: dan@dankopelman.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Jackie Mason Releases Video in Response to Silverman's "Schlep"

Mason calls Silverman a "yenta" for telling people how to vote.

The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) and comedian Jackie Mason today released a video response to comedian Sarah Silverman's "The Great Schlep" video.

In this video, legendary comedian Jackie Mason responds to Silverman's outlandish chutzpah of telling Jews to vote for Barack Obama. By contrast, Mason encourages people to look at the candidates' records and vote what their conscience tells them.

"Jackie Mason tells it like it is and there is no one else like him in the Jewish community. A central theme of this video is Mason's outrage at the arrogance and self-importance of Sarah Silverman and her Hollywood friends for telling people whom they should vote for. In addition, Mason points out that Silverman fails to make the case for why Obama should be president," said RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks. "While it is our hope that people will be entertained by this video, the message is a serious one. At the end of the day, no amount of Hollywood star power will erase the fact that Barack Obama continues to have a problem in the Jewish community."

Click here to watch the video
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama's Advisors Cast Doubt on his Judgment

Sen. Barack Obama continues to surrounds himself with a number of individuals and advisors (1) who are hostile to Israel and American Jews. They include Zbigniew Brzezinski, General Tony McPeak, Robert Malley and former Congressman David Bonior, and (2) all are known either for their anti-Israel views or their pro-Arab views - or both.

Brzezinski is well known for his aggressive dislike of Israel, and has been an ardent foe of Israel for more than three decades. As recently as 2006, he placed exclusive blame on Israel for the war in Lebanon, even making the outrageous claim that "I think what the Israelis are doing in Lebanon is, in effect, the killing of hostages."(3)

Obama's top military advisor McPeak told a newspaper that he believes Jews in Miami and New York are the obstacles to peace in the Middle East.(4)

Malley, a Palestinian apologist, invented and propagated the false claim that the 2000 Camp David summit failed because Israel wasn't serious about giving the Palestinians a state.(5)

And former U.S. Rep. Bonior refused to stand by Israel while in Congress, after repeated terrorist attacks, and was known as a stalwart opponent to Israel.(6)

For 20 years, Obama was part of the anti-American, anti-Semitic Reverend Jeremiah Wright's church. In fact, Obama called him his "sounding board."(7) Only after intense criticism of their relationship, Obama distanced himself from Wright.

As a result, these decisions raise serious questions about Barack Obama's judgement.

According to Republican Jewish Coalition Executive Director Matt Brooks, "It says something profound that Senator Obama surrounds himself with individuals who are consistently and strongly hostile to Israel, pro-Palestinian, and in the case of Jeremiah Wright, simply anti-American. These relationships leave one wondering about Senator Obama's wisdom and judgment."

"In a dangerous world, the strong alliance between the U.S. and Israel is a fundamental element in our own security, as well as a moral imperative. We expect our national leaders to understand that, and clearly Senator Obama has surrounded himself with people who hold the opposite view. A man is judged by the company he keeps, and one must ask why Senator Obama has chosen this company," said Brooks.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

L' Shana Tovah - Happy Rosh Hashanah!


Click Here

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dems' Comments about Jews are Divisive and Inappropriate

Hastings says Palin doesn't care about Jews and blacks. Cohen calls Jesus a Democrat.

Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) Executive Director Matt Brooks responded today to comments made yesterday by Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL) and Rep. Steven Cohen (D-TN):

CNN reported yesterday that Rep. Hastings, speaking to the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC), said, "Anybody toting guns and stripping moose don't care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks." Addressing the same panel, Rep. Cohen called Jesus "a great Democrat."

"Representative Hastings stooped to the worst kind of divisive politics yesterday. Hastings' unconscionable remarks do nothing but sow seeds of fear and divide people," said Brooks. "There should be no place in our country for this sort of political discourse. We can constructively disagree on the issues without denigrating others. As for the comments made by Rep. Cohen, I do not believe the NJDC would have been as permissive if it had been a Republican calling Jesus 'a great Republican.' This sort of rhetoric is inappropriate, offensive and should be repudiated."

Full CNN story below:

(CNN) - Rep. Alcee Hastings told an audience of Jewish Democrats Wednesday that they should be wary of Republican VP nominee Sarah Palin because "anybody toting guns and stripping moose don't care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks."

"If Sarah Palin isn't enough of a reason for you to get over whatever your problem is with Barack Obama, then you damn well had better pay attention," Rep. Alcee Hastings of Florida said at a panel about the shared agenda of Jewish and African-American Democrats Wednesday. Hastings, who is African-American, was explaining what he intended to tell his Jewish constituents about the presidential race. "Anybody toting guns and stripping moose don't care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks. So, you just think this through," Hastings added as the room erupted in laughter and applause.

After telling attendees that the most important thing Jewish and African-American Democrats could do to support one another was to get Sen. Barack Obama elected president, Hastings had one more message: "For those of you like me that supported Sen. Hillary Clinton, she lost! Get over it!"

Hastings was joined on the panel by Rep. Steven Cohen of Tennessee, who is Jewish and represents a majority African-American district; Rep. Artur Davis of Alabama, who is African-American and whose district includes many of the significant sites in the 1960's civil rights movement; and Georgetown Law Prof. Peter Edelman, who was a legislative assistant to Sen. Robert F. Kennedy.

Cohen, who recently remarked that Jesus Christ was a community organizer, took his comments about the founder of the Christian faith further Wednesday. "A lot of what Jesus talks about is wonderful," Cohen said. "Talks about helping people and lifting them up and caring about people who are sick and all those things. He's a great Democrat."

The panel was part of the National Jewish Democratic Council's annual conference. The Jewish Democratic group recently voiced criticism of Palin's invitation to an anti-Iran rally timed to coincide with Mahmoud Ahmedinajad's visit to New York for the United Nations General Assembly. Palin's invitation was withdrawn by the rally's organizers after Hillary Clinton announced that she would no longer be attending the event.

The support of Jewish voters is shaping up to be a highly sought after prize in the general election match-up between Sen. Obama and Sen. John McCain. Jews have historically favored Democrats by wide margins in recent presidential races. But, the McCain campaign is making a concerted effort to go after the loyal Democratic constituency and Obama has been plagued by false Internet rumors that he is Muslim which have had particular salience in the Jewish community.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Speech Palin Never Gave

Ahmadinejad Dreams of Final Solution
By Natasha Mozgovaya, Haaretz Correspondent

In the speech which Republican Vice-Presidential candidate Sarah Palin was to have delivered at a Monday rally protesting the UN appearance of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, she was to have said that the Iranian president "dreams of being an agent in a 'Final Solution' - the elimination of the Jewish people."

Her appearance in the rally in Dag Hammarskjold Plaza was cancelled in a flap between protest organizers and Hillary Clinton, who had also been scheduled to speak. Clinton aides were quoted as saying that they had been "blindsided" by the decision to invite Palin, which they called a partisan move. In the ensuing controversy, Clinton withdrew her participation, and Palin's invitation was rescinded.

The text of the speech follows:

I am honored to be with you and with leaders from across this great country - leaders from different faiths and political parties united in a single voice of outrage.

Tomorrow, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will come to New York - to the heart of what he calls the Great Satan - and speak freely in this, a country whose demise he has called for.

Ahmadinejad may choose his words carefully, but underneath all of the rhetoric is an agenda that threatens all who seek a safer and freer world. We gather here today to highlight the Iranian dictator's intentions and to call for action to thwart him.
He must be stopped.

The world must awake to the threat this man poses to all of us. Ahmadinejad denies that the Holocaust ever took place. He dreams of being an agent in a "Final Solution" - the elimination of the Jewish people. He has called Israel a "stinking corpse" that is "on its way to annihilation."

Such talk cannot be dismissed as the ravings of a madman -not when Iran just this summer tested long-range Shahab-3 missiles capable of striking Tel Aviv, not when the Iranian nuclear program is nearing completion, and not when Iran sponsors terrorists that threaten and kill innocent people around the world.

The Iranian government wants nuclear weapons. The International Atomic Energy Agency reports that Iran is running at least 3,800 centrifuges and that its uranium enrichment capacity is rapidly improving. According to news reports, U.S. intelligence agencies believe the Iranians may have enough nuclear material to produce a bomb within a year.

The world has condemned these activities. The United Nations Security Council has demanded that Iran suspend its illegal nuclear enrichment activities. It has levied three rounds of sanctions. How has Ahmadinejad responded? With the declaration that the "Iranian nation would not retreat one iota" from its nuclear program.

So, what should we do about this growing threat? First, we must succeed in Iraq. If we fail there, it will jeopardize the democracy the Iraqis have worked so hard to build, and empower the extremists in neighboring Iran. Iran has armed and trained terrorists who have killed our soldiers in Iraq, and it is Iran that would benefit from an American defeat in Iraq.

If we retreat without leaving a stable Iraq, Iran's nuclear ambitions will be bolstered. If Iran acquires nuclear weapons ? they could share them tomorrow with the terrorists they finance, arm, and train today. Iranian nuclear weapons would set off a dangerous regional nuclear arms race that would make all of us less safe.

But Iran is not only a regional threat; it threatens the entire world. It is the no. 1 state sponsor of terrorism. It sponsors the world's most vicious terrorist groups, Hamas and Hezbollah. Together, Iran and its terrorists are responsible for the deaths of Americans in Lebanon in the 1980s, in Saudi Arabia in the 1990s, and in Iraq today. They have murdered Iraqis, Lebanese, Palestinians, and other Muslims who have resisted Iran's desire to dominate the region. They have persecuted countless people simply because they are Jewish.

Iran is responsible for attacks not only on Israelis, but on Jews living as far away as Argentina. Anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial are part of Iran's official ideology and murder is part of its official policy. Not even Iranian citizens are safe from their government's threat to those who want to live, work, and worship in peace. Politically-motivated abductions, torture, death by stoning, flogging, and amputations are just some of its state-sanctioned punishments.

It is said that the measure of a country is the treatment of its most vulnerable citizens. By that standard, the Iranian government is both oppressive and barbaric. Under Ahmadinejad's rule, Iranian women are some of the most vulnerable citizens.

If an Iranian woman shows too much hair in public, she risks being beaten or killed. If she walks down a public street in clothing that violates the state dress code, she could be arrested.

But in the face of this harsh regime, the Iranian women have shown courage. Despite threats to their lives and their families, Iranian women have sought better treatment through the "One Million Signatures Campaign Demanding Changes to Discriminatory Laws." The authorities have reacted with predictable barbarism. Last year, women's rights activist Delaram Ali was sentenced to 20 lashes and 10 months in prison for committing the crime of "propaganda against the system." After international protests, the judiciary reduced her sentence to "only" 10 lashes and 36 months in prison and then temporarily suspended her sentence. She still faces the threat of imprisonment.

Earlier this year, Senator Clinton said that "Iran is seeking nuclear weapons, and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is in the forefront of that" effort. Senator Clinton argued that part of our response must include stronger sanctions, including the designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization. John McCain and I could not agree more.

Senator Clinton understands the nature of this threat and what we must do to confront it. This is an issue that should unite all Americans. Iran should not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons. Period. And in a single voice, we must be loud enough for the whole world to hear: Stop Iran!
Only by working together, across national, religious, and political differences, can we alter this regime's dangerous behavior. Iran has many vulnerabilities, including a regime weakened by sanctions and a population eager to embrace opportunities with the West. We must increase economic pressure to change Iran's behavior.

Tomorrow, Ahmadinejad will come to New York. On our soil, he will exercise the right of freedom of speech - a right he denies his own people. He will share his hateful agenda with the world. Our task is to focus the world on what can be done to stop him.

We must rally the world to press for truly tough sanctions at the U.N. or with our allies if Iran's allies continue to block action in the U.N. We must start with restrictions on Iran's refined petroleum imports. We must reduce our dependency on foreign oil to weaken Iran's economic influence.

We must target the regime's assets abroad; bank accounts, investments, and trading partners.

President Ahmadinejad should be held accountable for inciting genocide, a crime under international law.

We must sanction Iran's Central Bank and the Revolutionary Guard Corps -which no one should doubt is a terrorist organization. Together, we can stop Iran's nuclear program.

Senator McCain has made a solemn commitment that I strongly endorse: Never again will we risk another Holocaust. And this is not a wish, a request, or a plea to Israel's enemies. This is a promise that the United States and Israel will honor, against any enemy who cares to test us. It is John McCain's promise and it is my promise.

Thank you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ahmadinejad Says Israel Won't Survive

The Associated Press reported yesterday that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad lashed out at Israel on Thursday, saying the Jewish state would not survive, even if it gave up land for a Palestinian state.

He also dismissed allegations that his country is trying to make nuclear arms.Speaking to reporters in Tehran, the hard-line leader smirked at the former mantra of the Israeli right of a "Greater" Israel that would include land Palestinians want for a future state. The idea has since been abandoned, with the Israeli political consensus now being that there would be a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza, on either side of Israel.

"I have heard some say the idea of Greater Israel has expired," Ahmadinejad said. "I say that the idea of lesser Israel has expired, too."

Ahmadinejad used the news conference to speak at length before traveling to New York to attend the U.N. General Assembly that opened Tuesday.

The Iranian president repeated previous anti-Israel comments, calling the Holocaust a "fake" and saying that Israel is perpetrating a holocaust on the Palestinian people.

Yesterday Republican Jewish Coalition Executive Director Matt Brooks expressed outrage that the planned "Stop Iran" rally in New York had been hijacked by those with a political agenda.

"A strong effort by the Jewish community to stand up and show the world that we are united in our fight against this madman has been hijacked by those with a political agenda. We are extremely disappointed that in response to political pressure from partisan organizations, Governor Palin has been disinvited to the "Stop Iran" rally in New York. We are disappointed that neither Senator Obama nor Senator Biden chose to participate in this important event. Yet again they have missed an opportunity to stand up to Iran and have their voices heard," said RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks. "Senators Obama and Biden and their supporters have handed Ahmadinejad a big win."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama and Partisan Democrats Hand Win to Ahmadenijad

Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) Executive Director Matt Brooks issued the following statement today:

"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad has been quite clear of his intentions to acquire nuclear weapons; his anti-Semitic rants and desire to annihilate Israel are well-known. Today Senators Obama and Biden and their supporters have handed Ahmadenijad a big win. What should have been a strong effort by the Jewish community to stand up and show the world that we are united in our fight against this madman has instead been hijacked by those with a political agenda. This is a very sad day for the Jewish community.
We are extremely disappointed that in response to political pressure from partisan organizations, Governor Palin has been disinvited to the "Stop Iran" rally. In addition, we are disappointed that neither Senator Obama nor Senator Biden chose to participate in this important event. Yet again they have missed an opportunity to stand up to Iran and have their voices heard. This is but another example of why Senator Obama continues to have a problem in the Jewish community," said Brooks.
"In the more than 20 years I have worked in the Jewish community, this is one of the biggest black marks on our community that I can remember. That we can't put partisan differences aside to come together on something as important as this is absolutely outrageous. It is sad and disappointing."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shock Poll: Jews Now Favor McCain in New York, 54-32

By John Podhoretz of Commentary Magazine
The Siena poll, one of the two key polls of New York state voters, has come out with its monthly snapshot of the presidential race in the Empire State. And it’s stunning. It is remarkable, though not eye-opening, that John McCain is now only 5 points behind Barack Obama, 46-41 – not shocking because polls have narrowed to similar margins in New Jersey. (It should be noted, however, that according to a Rasmussen poll released yesterday, Obama is leading in New York by 55-42.)

No, the shocking detail has to do with a wild, 35-point swing toward McCain among Jewish voters. Obama led among them by a margin of 50-37 in August. This month, McCain is actually leading Obama by a margin of 54 percent to 32 percent.

Siena polled 626 likely voters this month. Of those, according to Steve Greenberg, the spokesman for the Siena poll, 77 were Jews, or 12 percent of the sample. That is Siena’s best guess of the size of the Jewish vote in New York state in November. With a sample size that small, the margin of error for the Jewish voter sample is plus-or-minus 11 points.

That means the poll could be off by as many as 11 points in either direction — i.e., McCain could be leading by as little as 11 points or by as many as 33. (UPDATE: I got this wrong; this stat could also mean they’re tied or that McCain is more than 40 points ahead or anywhere in the middle. For a clarification on this point, click here.)

The only difference between the September poll and the August poll as a matter of methodology is that in September, Siena polled likely voters, whereas in August it only polled registered voters.

The poll could, of course, be an outlier. But if it even begins to approximate the truth, it is huge news. No Republican has scored more than 39 percent of the Jewish vote in modern times, and that was Ronald Reagan in 1980, following a series of missteps by the Carter administration. These sorts of numbers for McCain have implications in two other states particularly — Florida and Pennsylvania.

In Florida, the implications are obvious. Obama’s own Jewish organizers in Florida are telling the campaign they are finding profound resistance to him, particularly in South Florida. The polling overall there seems to be moving inexorably in McCain’s direction, which is necessary for him; it is nearly impossible to see how he can win the election if he loses Florida.

But what about Pennsylvania? That is a state it appears Obama must win. There are, it is estimated, more than 200,000 Jewish voters in Pennsylvania, a state John Kerry won by 140,000 votes. If we assume Pennsylvania’s 200,000 voting Jews voted in the same way as Jews nationwide in 2004 and went 76-24 for Kerry, we can attribute 150,000 Jewish votes to Kerry, his entire margin of victory plus seven percent. Now imagine if that number had been closer to 50-50. Kerry would have received 100,000 Jewish votes rather than 150,000. Bush would have received 100,000 Jewish votes rather than 50,000. Kerry’s margin of victory would then have shrunk to 40,000 votes.

It appears Obama may have a tougher time in Pennsylvania than Kerry did because of his difficulty attracting the ethnic white vote in the western part of the state. If there is a Jewish swing away from him as well, he really could lose there. And if he loses there and loses Ohio, he is sunk. Ohio has approximately 80,000 Jewish voters, so a swing away from Obama to a 50-50 race would cost him 25,000 votes Kerry presumably received in 2004 — and in a state that Bush won by 121,000 votes.

We’ll need more data from two other states with a significant Jewish population to allow for a measurable sample size in a poll – Florida and California – and a polling firm willing to break out the Jewish vote as Siena has, to see whether this is just statistical smoke or whether Obama has a brushfire he needs to put out somehow before it consumes him.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RJC Releases Ad Highlighting Pat Buchanan's Support for Obama's Positions

Today the RJC released the latest in an ongoing series of ads targeting the Jewish community. These ads are running in major Jewish newspapers around the country. They are part of a substantial national campaign to educate the community about issues of particular concern to American Jews.
 
The new ad highlights an endorsement of Senator Barack Obama's Israel and Middle East views by commentator Pat Buchanan. Buchanan said on MSNBC:
 
"Let me say about Israel here. My position on Israel is frankly awful. It is like Mika [Brzezinski]'s father's, it's a lot closer to Barack Obama's than it is John McCain. I think Barack is right, we ought to talk to the Iranians, he's right to oppose the war and, frankly, he's right to say the Palestinian people have got a terrible deal over there and their suffering ought to be recognized. That's Obama's position. It's my position. I don't think it is a Nazi position."
 
"By no means does the RJC infer from this quote that Barack Obama supports the views of Patrick Buchanan. Rather, we are highlighting the fact that Buchanan believes that his views are in line with Obama's on the critical issues of Israel and Iran," said RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks. "Because Pat Buchanan shares Obama's views on Iran and Israel, how comfortable can the Jewish community be with those positions?" Brooks added.

Buchanan has consistently been wrong on issues related to Israel and the Middle East. The ad concludes:

Pat Buchanan says he shares the same views on Israel as Barack Obama. Those views are dangerous, reckless and wrong.

Click here to see the ad.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thinking Outside the Lox

An article from The Wall Street Journal by Joseph Epstein
 
Today, class, we shall take up the oxymoron, the figure of speech in which two contradictory words appear in conjunction. Here are some prime examples: amicable divorce, congressional ethics, definite maybe, military justice and Jewish Republican. Jewish Republicans may be rarer than Jewish coal miners. Let's face it, no one gazing at the crowd of the Republican convention in St. Paul last week would have mistaken it for Sam and Becky Lebowitz's grandson's bar mitzvah party.

The reason it is so difficult for Jews to vote for Republicans is largely historical. The GOP for many years seemed the party of the large corporations, the excluding country clubs, the restricted neighborhoods -- all institutions dedicated to keeping Jews out -- so that even now the Republican Party is associated, in the minds of Jews of a certain age, with anti-Semitism.

I have Jewish friends who believe in free markets, are deeply suspicious of big government, view the general bag of leftist ideas as callow if not dangerous, yet would sooner tuck into a large plate of pigs' feet than vote for a Republican for president. They just can't bring themselves to do it.

Like most Jews, I grew up in a house that was Democratic and devoted to Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The reason for this devotion is that, in opposition to the isolationists then known as American Firsters, FDR, an internationalist, saw the need to go to war to stop the Nazis, who were systematically murdering the Jews of Europe. Only much later was it learned that Roosevelt could have saved many more European Jews by enlarging immigration quotas, but his policy was instead the mistaken one of trying to save the Jews by winning the war as quickly as possible. As we now know, the war wasn't won quickly enough.

Owing to the overwhelming Jewish support for Roosevelt, few were the Jews who openly declared themselves Republican. As a boy, in the early 1950s, I knew only one: a man named Hyman Skolnick, the father of a friend, who was an executive for a Jewish-owned scrap-metal company in Chicago. An immigrant, Mr. Skolnick had an inborn gravity that derived from what I took to be his high competence and mastery of facts. I sensed that he was a man who, if you woke him at four in the morning, could tell you, within $20, the exact amount of the gross national product as of the hour.

I did not meet another Jewish Republican until the early 1960s, when I met Irving Kristol -- who, after a career as a Trotskyist lasting for roughly 27 minutes while he was a student at the City College of New York, did not impede his philosophical and temperamental conservatism from steering him toward the GOP. For this Irving Kristol was considered, stupidly, by Irving Howe and other Irvings and not a few Seymours, a great heresiarch, nothing less than a traitor to his people.

The Democrats' record on things Jewish is finally not all that strong. Joe Kennedy, the so-called founding father of the Kennedy clan, was pro-Hitler and famously anti-Semitic. Jimmy Carter, in his sentimental idealism, has called Israel an apartheid state, comparable with South Africa. I always thought that Bill Clinton, in his vanity, would have done his best to convince the Israelis to give up the West Bank and the East Bank, and toss in Katz's Delicatessen on Houston Street at no extra charge, in his eagerness to win a Nobel Peace Prize.

Despite all this, Jews cling to the Democratic Party. The Democrats, they claim, remain the party most interested in social justice, and it is incumbent upon Jews, who have known so much injustice in their own history, to be on the side of social justice.

The only Democratic administration in the past 50 years that may be said to have made good on a program of social justice was that of Lyndon Johnson, himself today much less admired, by Jews and others, for his efforts in this line -- the civil rights voting acts, the war against poverty -- than despised for his policy in Vietnam. As for social justice, who is responsible for more of it, on a world-wide scale, than Ronald Reagan, in his helping to bring an end to tyrannous communism?

I only voted for my first Republican candidate for president in 1980, when I voted for Reagan. Even then I did not so much vote for Reagan as against Jimmy Carter. What made me vote against Mr. Carter was his vapidity and weakness. I remember a photograph, on the front page of the New York Times of Mr. Carter, in jogging gear, after having fainted during a run on the White House lawn, being held up by two Secret Service men. My God, I thought, this pathetic man, with his hot-combed hair, cannot be the leader of my country. I have voted for Republicans for president ever since, with the exception of 1996, when I found I could not vote for either Bob Dole or Bill Clinton, and took the high (if somewhat lumpy) ground of not voting at all.

I shall probably vote for John McCain in this year's presidential election. But I am not locked in on my vote, and if the McCain-Palin campaign gets dramatically stupid, I could go the other way. I make no claim to be an original political thinker, but, unlike so many of my co-religionists, I feel a nice sense of freedom, knowing that I am able to think, so to say, outside the lox.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jewish GOP'ers Look for New Recruits

This article comes from the Jewish Daily Forward by Brett Lieberman

Long considered an oxymoron, Jewish Republicans, who represent 15% to 25% of Jewish  voters, are suddenly feeling a little less lonely.

More than 400 Republican Jews and their supporters packed a reception that the Republican Jewish Coalition hosted to salute governors at the Republican National Convention. The event also drew Sallai Meridor, Israel’s ambassador to the United States; state lawmakers, and major donors.
 
At a time when the Republican brand is having trouble, the Republicans among Jewish voters are doing the best they have in a long time, and obviously the Democrats have some troubles among Jewish voters,” said Matt Brooks, the RJC’s executive director. Brooks offered an upbeat prediction that the Republicans’ share of the Jewish vote will continue to grow during this fall’s election. Some, however, say Brooks’s assessment may be a little too rosy.
 
In 2004, Bush won 22% of the Jewish vote, while John Kerry garnered 78%, according to estimates from an analysis by Mellman and other pollsters that were compiled by the Solomon Project. The RJC cites other surveys that put the GOP share of the Jewish vote as high as 25% in 2004.
 
What is incontrovertible is the major effort that both parties are making to win over Jewish voters. The RJC’s chairman, David Flaum, was included in the line-up of speakers scheduled to address the GOP convention the night of September 4. Democrats included a record seven rabbis in their national convention program in Denver.
 
Since the 1930s, American Jews have overwhelmingly cast their support for Democrats in the range of 60% to 90%. The only recent exception to that was in 1980, when Jimmy Carter polled only 45% of the Jewish vote against Reagan in 1980 (with independent John Anderson pulling some 17% of Jewish votes). The fact is, however, that both Mellman and Brooks may be right. The Republican share of the Jewish vote may not be growing as much as Brooks contends, but there are signs that the party’s numbers could grow and that Jewish voters may be more open to Republican positions this year than in recent history.

So who are Jewish Republicans?

Republican Jews are all sizes, shapes, genders, ages, backgrounds,” said Cheryl Halpern, a former national chair of the Republican Jewish Coalition whom President Bush appointed to the board of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting in 2002.

We are not single-issue people,” said Halpern, who hails from New Jersey and became chairwoman of the broadcasting corporation’s board in 2005. But following the peak of the Democratic share of the Jewish vote in 2000, at close to 80%, Republicans have seen some incremental gains — thanks, in large part, to Orthodox and Russian Jews. Together these two groups may account for as many as 1 million of the estimated 6 million Jews living in the United States and represent the lion’s share of reliable Republican voters among Jews, according to pollsters, analysts and those who have studied the Jewish vote.

Over time, there is hope in the Republican Party that this could become a significant voting block,” said Jonathan Sarna, a professor of American Jewish history at Brandeis University. Orthodox Jews’ support for Republicans mirrors the greater support that the GOP has found among the more religious. “What we are seeing is, there is a huge gap between the religious and the nonreligious,” Sarna said. “Orthodox voters, I think, are voting Republican for many of the same reasons evangelicals are: They just feel at home with them.”

According to the American Jewish Committee’s 2007 survey of national Jewish opinion, completed last November, 43% of American Jews consider themselves liberal, 31% describe themselves as moderate and 25% identify as conservative. Only 15% described themselves as Republican, 58% as Democrats and 26% as Independents. Compared with the general public, Jewish voters who were surveyed placed a greater emphasis on the importance of such issues as terrorism and the Iraq War, and a lesser emphasis on the economy. But since the AJCommittee poll was conducted in late 2007, overall public sentiment has shifted along with the economy, which now dominates most public-opinion surveys.

Republicans are encouraged this year by Obama’s support — in the 60% range, according to several polls — among Jewish voters, which places him in a position of low historical Jewish support for Democratic candidates. Democrats say it’s early and predict that Obama’s numbers will return to the normal range of Jewish support. But Republican John McCain’s popularity with some Jewish voters, questions about Obama’s foreign policy and his positions on Iran, and discredited Internet rumors that suggest Obama is Muslim have softened his support, according to Republican and Democratic Jewish leaders and pollsters.
 
Lending credence to Republicans’ optimism about growing their Jewish support is that Orthodox and Russian Jews’ top concerns — Israel, foreign policy and national security — are issues with which the GOP has historically found more support among voters of all faiths. While Orthodox Jews tend to have larger families than less observant Jews and represent the fastest- growing segment of the American Jewish community, many family members are too young to vote. Many Russian Jews, who often oppose “anything that smacks to them of socialism or things that remind them of the USSR,” are more inclined to support a candidate such as McCain, but often these people are not
citizens and therefore are ineligible to vote, Sarna notes.

According to political analyst Stuart Rothenberg, Jewish voters, of course, are not monolithic. “Jews are like everybody else,” he said. “There are some who have a conservative temperament to government and finance and foreign policy and even cultural issues. But there are also more who are liberal.”

But if the most ardent Jewish Republican voters tend to be more religious, the most successful Jewish Republican elected officials tend to bemore moderate. Examples are Senators Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Norm Coleman of Minnesota, and Governor Linda Lingle of Hawaii. The RJC is a lobbying group that many Jewish Republicans credit for their growing ranks. Its leadership has enjoyed a seat at the table with top GOP leaders, including President Bush, and the RJC has become an influential fundraising and organizing entity.

Founded as the National Jewish Coalition by Jewish leaders with ties to the Reagan administration as a way to gain a singular voice, the RJC has grown into a force that greatly exceeds the number of its members and the influence of its rival, the National Jewish Democratic Council.
“For the most part, when Republican Jews are engaged, they are wearing an RJC hat or a Jewish yarmulke,” one Jewish leader said. “It’s just not that way with the NJDC, because there are so many more avenues for Democrats…. It’s so much more diffuse.”

That concentration of power, fundraising and organizing ability is what drew a large number of non-Jewish governors, including those from states with small Jewish populations, to the recent reception.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jewish Dems Worry About Obama's Low Support with Jews

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency has blogged a few stories about the deep worry among Jewish Democrats that Obama isn't picking up the kind of support that's expected for a Democratic candidate. In reports about the National Jewish Democratic Council session on Jewish voting at the Democratic Party’s Denver convention, JTA noted: "According to] leading Jewish state legislators from Florida: It’s not that McCain was beloved, it’s that Obama was 'hated' among elderly Jews in the state." Apparently "...Obama’s Jewish surrogates have come away from the condo tours 'shocked' at the intensity of dislike for their presidential candidate."

and this comment:

"...Barack Obama is underperforming among Jewish voters compared to recent historical standards — just 61-62 percent in recent polls of Jewish voters, in contrast to the 75 percent and above that Democrats have won among Jews in the last four presidential elections."
 
It's important to remember that the percentage of Jews voting Republican has increased each presidential election year since 1992, from 11 percent that year to 25 percent in 2004. By all estimates, we predict that the Jewish Republican vote will grow to over 30 percent this year.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gov. Palin Stands By Israel!

In his September 11, 2008 interview with Republican Vice Presidential Nominee Gov. Sarah Palin, Charlie Gibson of ABC News asked: What if Israel decided it felt threatened and needed to take out the Iranian nuclear facilities?

Her response:

"We cannot second guess
the steps that Israel has to take to defend itself."

Sarah Palin on Iran and Israel:

GIBSON: Let me turn to Iran. Do you consider a nuclear Iran to be an existential threat to Israel?

PALIN: I believe that under the leadership of Ahmadinejad, nuclear weapons in the hands of his government are extremely dangerous to everyone on this globe, yes.

GIBSON: So what should we do about a nuclear Iran? John McCain said the only thing worse than a war with Iran would be a nuclear Iran. John Abizaid said we may have to live with a nuclear Iran. Who's right?

PALIN: No, no. I agree with John McCain that nuclear weapons in the hands of those who would seek to destroy our allies, in this case, we're talking about Israel, we're talking about Ahmadinejad's comment about Israel being the "stinking corpse, should be wiped off the face of the earth," that's atrocious. That's unacceptable.

GIBSON: So what do you do about a nuclear Iran?

PALIN: We have got to make sure that these weapons of mass destruction, that nuclear weapons are not given to those hands of Ahmadinejad, not that he would use them, but that he would allow terrorists to be able to use them. So we have got to put the pressure on Iran and we have got to count on our allies to help us, diplomatic pressure.

GIBSON: But, Governor, we've threatened greater sanctions against Iran for a long time. It hasn't done any good. It hasn't stemmed their nuclear program.

PALIN: We need to pursue those and we need to implement those. We cannot back off. We cannot just concede that, oh, gee, maybe they're going to have nuclear weapons, what can we do about it. No way, not Americans. We do not have to stand for that.

GIBSON: What if Israel decided it felt threatened and needed to take out the Iranian nuclear facilities?

PALIN: Well, first, we are friends with Israel and I don't think that we should second guess the measures that Israel has to take to defend themselves and for their security.

GIBSON: So if we wouldn't second guess it and they decided they needed to do it because Iran was an existential threat, we would cooperative or agree with that.

PALIN: I don't think we can second guess what Israel has to do to secure its nation.

GIBSON: So if it felt necessary, if it felt the need to defend itself by taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, that would be all right.

PALIN: We cannot second guess the steps that Israel has to take to defend itself.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RJC Congratulates Palin on VP Nomination

On the occasion of Gov. Sarah Palin's vice-presidential nomination, Republican Jewish Coalition Executive Director Matt Brooks issued the following statement today:

"We congratulate Governor Sarah Palin on her historic nomination as she joins the Republican ticket as vice president. As a reformer, Governor Palin's frontier spirit and leadership compliments John McCain's own bipartisan nature. Governor Palin clearly recognizes the necessity of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. She is committed to strengthening the U.S. - Israel relationship. Her relationship with the Jewish community of Alaska is exemplary. Together, John McCain and Sarah Palin make a strong team, well-equipped to take on the many difficult challenges facing our nation during these troubling times."

What Others Are Saying About Gov. Sarah Palin:

"Governor Sarah Palin, like John McCain, is a reformer who has taken on the special interests and reached across party lines." -- Sen.
Joe Lieberman, Republican National Convention, 9/2/2008

"I am excited by John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin as his Vice-Presidential running mate. Sarah brings a wealth of experience to the campaign and will pose a formidable challenge to the Democratic nominees. As governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin is in a position to help articulate an all-encompassing, long-term energy strategy that will lower gas prices and create jobs, while protecting the environment. This will stand in stark contrast to the Obama / Biden team which opposes all efforts to reduce gas prices. Sarah Palin is a smart conservative woman who represents change. Real change not the stale rhetoric coming from Obama." -- Rep. Eric Cantor, ericcantor.com, August 29, 2008

"[Gov. Palin] has established a great relationship with the Jewish community [in Alaska] over recent years, and has attended several of our Jewish cultural gala events." -- Rabbi Yosef Greenberg. lubavitch.com, August 31, 2008

"The Jewish community should be very excited that Sarah was in Alaska and now with the opportunity of her new position, she'll have the opportunity to look at the Jewish community globally... Sarah's absolutely pro-Israel,"--Alaskan Republican Jewish Coalition member Terry Gorlick, Jerusalem Post, August 30, 2008.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Don’t Discount Palin’s Foreign-Policy Credentials

Critics are already trying to damn Sarah Palin for her perceived lack of foreign-policy experience, but what they are not allowing for is something more important — that she has the right basic attitudes and sense of priorities. She understands that aggression has to be resisted and commitments have to be honored.

Certainly there is every sign that she will be better for at least one of America’s closest friends and allies, Israel, than Joe Biden.

It is true that Biden talks of his support for Israel in principle, but the reality is that he has done his utmost to thwart keeping the possibility of a military option open to stop Iran acquiring nuclear weapons. As a result he was even praised recently on the Iranian regime’s official propaganda arm, Press TV. It is no accident that Biden was dubbed “Tehran’s favorite senator” in an article in the Washington Post last week. By contrast, the very first reference to foreign policy that Palin made in her acceptance speech after being chosen as John McCain’s vice-presidential candidate Friday was that Iran must be stopped from getting nuclear weapons. She mentioned this even before she mentioned the issues of Iraq and Russia.

Palin has a record for integrity and for getting the job done matched by very few politicians, as shown by her success in tackling the corrupt Republican-party establishment in Alaska, and her highly effective economic program there.

The U.S. and Israel can have every confidence that, like McCain, she is a doer who means what she says — not someone like Joe Biden who may come out with fine sentiments but seems unwilling to get to grips with fundamental problems posed by Iran and Syria.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive