About Us

Name: J-GOP
Email: moreinfo@j-gop.org Biography
Name: KarenKataline
Email: Karen@KarenKataline.com
Name: Dan
Email: dan@dankopelman.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Nadler Admits to Obama's Lack of Political Courage

Republican Jewish Coalition Executive Director Matt Brooks responded today to the comments made by Rep. Jerrold Nadler's (D-NY) at a forum in Boca Raton, Florida yesterday. Rep. Nadler, acting as an Obama surrogate, said Obama didn't leave Trinity United Church, after learning of Rev. Jeremiah Wright's anti-American and anti-Israel rhetoric, because he "didn't have the political courage to make the statement of walking out."

"It is ironic that Obama's own surrogate recognizes Obama lacks the political courage to stand up for what is right," said Brooks. "Having failed to stand up to anti-American and anti-Israel rhetoric in the past, one has to wonder if Obama will have the courage to stand up to it as president? Because Obama has not stood up to this type of rhetoric and because of Obama's choice of associates and advisers, the Jewish community remains deeply concerned about an Obama Presidency. Even Obama surrogate Rep. Jerrold Nadler acknowledges that when faced with tough decisions in the past, Obama lacked the political courage to do what is right."

Watch the video of Rep. Nadler's comments.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

American Votes from Israel Shows Big McCain Win

Within the last hour, the first exit poll of 817 Americans in Israel, who attended U.S. election voting events in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv on Tuesday evening to vote by absentee ballot, has been released.

A startling 76 percent of those polled said that they had voted for John McCain. This contrasts sharply with pre-election polls of American Jews in the U.S., which indicate a strong preference for Obama.

The exit poll findings of American voters in Israel are all the more surprising because less than one in four were registered Republicans, and 46% of registered Democrats living in Israel said they had crossed party lines to vote McCain. By contrast, the Republican crossover to Obama was minimal – just 2%.

The votes are significant as almost half of the 42,000 registered U.S. voters living in Israel come from key swing states including Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

In the 2000 and 2004 elections, Israel had the third-largest group of American voters abroad, after Canada and Britain.

The exit poll was commissioned by Votefromisrael.org, an independent, non-partisan organization dedicated to promoting voter registration and participation amongst American citizens living in Israel.

More than half of the respondents listed foreign policy (including Israel and Iran policy) as the most important factor influencing their vote.

Separately, in a poll for the country’s largest newspaper, Yediot Ahronot, most Israelis in general (not just Americans living in Israel) said they would prefer McCain because they are concerned about the anti-Israeli positions of many of the people Barack Obama has appointed to advise him on foreign policy, and because – in the words of French President Nicolas Sarkozy as quoted in Tuesday’s Ha’aretz newspaper – Obama’s stance on Iran is “utterly immature” and comprised of “formulations empty of all content.”

In most countries, according to opinion polls, if the local populations had a vote in next week’s American elections, they would choose Obama over McCain.

Among the exceptions (where McCain would win) are Israel, Iraq, Georgia and the Philippines (all countries that have had to cope with terrorism).
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

New RJC Ad Calls Barack Obama "Dangerously Naive"

The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) has released the latest in its series of national advertisements. These ads constitute the largest-ever advertising campaign undertaken by the RJC.

This ad features a round-up of the concerns the RJC has expressed about Barack Obama throughout the last few months.

The ad begins: "Many Americans have questions about Senator Barack Obama and whether his views are good for the United States and Israel. And for good reason."

Sen. Obama has not shown the wisdom, experience or strength on issues important to Israel. Most concerning is Senator Barack Obama's naïve grasp of the threats against the United States and Israel.

From his opposition to legislation against labeling Iran's Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization(1) to his willingness to meet with Iranian President Ahmadinejad and other hostile nations without any preconditions,(2) Senator Barack Obama has raised real questions about his judgment and experience.

Obama surrounds himself with anti-Israel friends and advisors like General Tony McPeak, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Rashid Khalidi and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. These men have played instrumental roles in shaping Sen. Obama's world views.

At the annual AIPAC Policy Conference, Sen. Obama said Jerusalem should be the undivided capital of Israel.(3) The very next day, facing criticism from the Palestinian Authority and Arab nations, he flip-flopped. Sen. Obama said the future of Jerusalem would have to be negotiated by Israel and the Palestinians,(4) calling his support for an undivided Jerusalem a "poor phrasing" of words.(5)

(1) Obama press release, 9/26/07; www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/soft_on_iran.html; (2) CNN/YouTube debate, 7/23/07; (3) Haaretz.com, 6/5/08; (4) Washington Post, 6/6/08; (5) Jerusalem Post, 7/14/08

The ad concludes: "History has shown that a naïve and weak foreign policy has resulted in tragic outcomes for the Jewish people. Barack Obama: Dangerously Naïve."

RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks said, "We live in perilous times. Since 9/11, Americans have understood that we are in a war, and have come to recognize that Iran, Syria, and other rogue countries pose a serious threat to our security and to our closest allies, especially Israel. Sen. Obama's willingness to meet with the Iranian president, his opposition to labeling Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization, and his flip-flopping on Jerusalem raise serious questions about his positions and his experience.

"Obama's anti-Israel friends and advisors likewise raise concerns about Sen. Obama's foreign policy thinking." said Brooks.

"We need a president who has the experience and the wisdom to discern enemies from friends, and the personal strength to lead our country through the difficult times ahead. The weak and naive foreign policy espoused by Sen. Obama is dangerous for the U.S. and dangerous for Israel."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

New RJC Ad Compares Records of Senators McCain, Clinton, and Obama on Key Foreign Policy Questions

The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) has released the latest in an ongoing series of national advertisements. These ads are part of a substantial advertising campaign undertaken by the RJC.

The new ad compares the records of Senators McCain, Clinton and Obama on three key issues:

On an undivided Jerusalem;

On meeting with leaders of hostile nations;

On labeling Iran's Revolutionary Guard terrorists.

In each case, John McCain and Hillary Clinton agree, with the less-experienced Barack Obama taking the opposite view.

The ad concludes: "Now are you concerned about Barack Obama? You should be."

RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks said, "One of the most important things in foreign policy is understanding who your friends are and who your enemies are. The three key issues of foreign policy highlighted in our new ad are good indicators of that understanding, and in each instance, Obama failed the test."

"Jerusalem's status as the undivided capital of Israel is deeply symbolic of a firm recognition of the sovereignty of our chief ally, Israel. A commitment to Israel's sovereignty and security is the keystone to our Middle East policy. The naive notion that simply sitting down with the leaders of hostile nations will somehow change the minds of people determined on destroying the U.S. and Israel is absurd. And failing to recognize a terrorist organization by its ideology and actions shows a lack of understanding about the nature and purposes of terrorist groups. All in all, Obama's position on these issues demonstrates a lack of experience and good judgment," said Brooks.

Click here to see the ad.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tehran Regime Welcomes U.S. Economic Woes


by Jonathan Schanzer
Washington Times
October 22, 2008

www.jewishpolicycenter.org/article/351

As Americans struggle with the loss of wealth resulting from the ongoing credit crunch, subprime mortgage meltdown, and subsequent stock drops, the leading figures of the Islamic Republic of Iran are cheering unabashedly.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gloated recently that the United States is paying the price for exporting inflation and deficits to the rest of the world, "Now the world capacity is full and these problems have returned ... And finally they [Americans] are oppressors, and systems based on oppression and unrighteous positions will not endure," he said.

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, also reveled in the financial crisis, expressing his hope that it marked the end of U.S. domination over the world economy. "The false bubble of money in the West has broken," he said on state television, adding that the recent mortgage meltdown was the beginning of the end for free market capitalism.

Similarly, Iranian Guardian Council secretary and interim Friday prayer leader Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati professed that the U.S.'s economic crisis was "divine punishment." He stated, "we are happy that the United States economy has come across difficulty. They are attesting unfavorable consequences of their conduct.They are experiencing divine punishment. We are happy over that. The unhappier they become, the happier we get, as they become happy as we get unhappy." He said that Americans could expect to be "slapped in the face by Islam, Muslims, and the Islamic Revolution."

That slap in the face may come in the form of Iran-induced higher oil prices. Indeed, Iran's Oil Minister Gholam Hossein Nozari recently told reporters at an energy conference, "$100 and below is not suitable for oil producers or oil consumers." Iran, of course, is the world's fourth-largest exporter, and ranks among the more powerful members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), a corrupt cartel that determines the level of oil production, which directly impacts the cost of oil.

Surging fuel prices have crippled U.S. consumers in recent years, adding to mounting concerns over whether America is about to enter or has already entered an economic recession.

Higher oil prices are not the only arrow in the Iranian quiver. Former Iranian president (and now powerful cleric) Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani gloated in a recent radio broadcast, "if the economic crisis in America is becoming a serious threat for the West and the industrial world, one of the underlying reasons is the high costs which the Americans have been forced to spend in the region in the past seven or eight years."

Indeed, Iran is one of the primary reasons the United States has been bogged down in Iraq since 2003. The Iranians have sponsored radical militias, planned and executed terrorist attacks, and fomented internecine violence between Shi'ites and Sunnis. Continuing this activity will only ensure that America expends both blood and treasure.

Several important observations can be gleaned from these unabashed celebrations in Tehran over recent American economic woes: First, there can be no doubt that, across the board, from clerics to elected leaders, the Iranian leadership is a zealous and avowed enemy of the United States.

Their uninhibited glee stemming from international financial panic appears to mirror the eagerness, expressed by Mr. Ahmadinejad and other radical leaders, to embrace the collapse of the current world order - through war or other means. In their minds, this would herald the arrival of the Twelfth Imam, or "Mahdi," (a messianic figure from the ninth century) who would reappear to signal the end of the modern world and the onset of global Islamic justice.

Moreover, while it does not state so explicitly, the Iranian leadership knows that the longer America's economic struggles continue, the harder it will be to stop their long march toward nuclear weaponization.

Thus, while it has long been understood that the defeat or overthrow of the current Iranian regime would be in the best political and military interest of the United States, it is now clear that the demise of the Islamic Republic would be a reassuring American financial victory, too.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Understanding Obama's Web of Influence

There is a reason Senator Obama choose to attend Jeremiah Wright's church over all the other Chicago churches when he was seeking a religious affiliation that was not a mosque. Wright, a former member of the Nation of Islam and a good friend of it's leader, Louis Farrakhan, offered a similar anti-white, Black Liberation philosophy as the Black Muslims, but Obama could claim membership in a church at the time he was planning a political career. This choice was supported by his wife Michelle, who has acknowledged being greatly influenced by the black nationalist writings of Stokley Carmicheal and Charles Hamilton in her 1985 thesis at Princeton University.
There is a reason that the Obamas' fondness for Wright would produce fondness for Farrakhan. Wright calls Farrakhan "a great man". And the Obamas could well appreciate Farrakhan's selection of Stokley Carmicheal to warm up the crowd in Madison Square Garden that same year, 1985, when the leader of the Nation of Islam reinforced his notorietyby warning Jews, "You can't say 'Never Again' to G-d, because when he puts you in the ovens, you're there forever!".
 
There is a reason (the subsequently indicted and convicted) Tony Rezko undertook to fund Obama's political campaigns (including chairing his finance committee) and helping with the purchase of the lot next door to the house he purchased. Rezko, with long standing business relationships with the Nation of Islam, was the designated contact between Farrakhan and the well educated child of a mixed union, Obama. And while Obama drew inspiration from the writings of the famous MalcolmX (the apostate Black Muslim who had evolved past the Nation of Islam's hatred of white people to embrace Islam's race neutral hatred of the infidel), Farrakhan nevertheless saw in Obama great potential to advance his agenda. And that is why agents of the Nation of Islam have financially supported him and its members have held high positions in his campaigns and continue to do so in his Senate office. And of course why Louis Farrakhan, the
 
There is a reason Senator Obama has chosen people hostile to Israel like General Merrill "Tony" McPeak, Jimmy Carter's disastrous national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski and his son Mark, Anthony Lake, and Robert O. Malley as his military and middle east advisors. They agree with his close friend and 'former' PLO representative Rashid Khalidi, that it is the stubbornness of the Jews (in clinging to their racist state) which perpetuates the Israeli-Arab conflict and inflames Americas' relations with the Moslem world. This view is reinforced by the conduit of Saudi money to Obama. That is the same man who helped get him into Harvard - black nationalist, Muslim attorney Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour, the advisor to the Saudi prince (Al-Waleed bin Talal) who funds Islamic Wahhabi centers and university Islamic Studies and Middle East professorships all over America.
 
And finally, there is a reason Obama so boldly and dangerously declares, that he would sit down without precondition with any enemy of America, including Iran's holocaust denying and holocaust promising Ahmadinejad - that is his friend and middle-east mentor, Khalidi, is the one who schedules the would be Hitler's speaking engagements including his appearance at Columbia University in 2007.
 
There is a reason Obama was asked to represent ACORN in the Motor Voter lawsuit against the State of Illinois years ago. His affinity for the politics of confrontation espoused by radical community organizer Saul Alinsky, and taken to the next level by the brilliant political machinations of his friend Bill Ayers, saw the election process itself vulnerable to sabotage. Thus, funded in no small part by the lavish financial support of billionaire George Soros, the kingmaker of the Democratic Party; private grants of foundations Ayers and Obama oversaw; the federal money the Illinois Senator and his colleagues could steer their way from Washington; and with over $800,000 from the Obama campaign itself, ACORNand its network of radical peace groups, Arab and Muslim "civil rights " organizations, radical welfare pressure groups, Israel bashing Palestinian advocacy groups, and other activists have flooded County Election offices throughout the battle ground states with fraudulent voter registrations in order to later inflate the vote tally of their favorite candidate and propel their advocate, Senator Obama, to victory in November.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Concerned about Barack Obama's Naive Foreign Policy? You Should Be

The Republican Jewish Coalition has released a television advertisement which will run for the next two weeks on broadcast and cable television in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Nevada. The total media buy for this ad is in excess of one million dollars.

The ad features a video clip from the July 23, 2007 Democratic primary debate on CNN, in which Senator Barack Obama was asked whether he would "be willing to meet, separately, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, and North Korea?" Senator Obama replied, "I would."

Asked the same question, Senator Hillary Clinton replied, "I will not promise to meet with the leaders of these countries. I don't want to be used for propaganda purposes."

The next day, in a telephone interview with the Quad City Times (7/24/2007), Sen. Clinton characterized Sen. Obama's response as "irresponsible and frankly naïve."

The ad continues: "Hillary was right. The stakes are too high. Concerned about Barack Obama's naïve foreign policy? You should be."

RJC Executive Director Matthew Brooks said, "Barack Obama's willingness to sit down unconditionally with the leaders of these five countries is irresponsible and naïve. Senator Clinton was right that such meetings would be seen as a propaganda victory for totalitarian regimes which persecute their own citizens, sponsor terrorism, and have attempted to develop devastating nuclear weapons."

Brooks continued, "We are investing considerable resources in getting this message out because we believe that Senator Obama's naïve foreign policy thinking raises serious concerns about his judgment. Our country needs experienced, thoughtful leaders to take us safely through the tough times ahead."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Campaign Withdraws From Two Jewish Debates

Will they duck debates in Philadelphia, Los Angeles, New York and Cleveland?

The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) Executive Director Matt Brooks issued the following statement today:

Now that the Presidential debates are over, the Obama campaign is trying to cancel all remaining debates in the Jewish community that include the Republican Jewish Coalition.

Claiming they do not like recent RJC advertisements, the Obama campaign has formally instructed all of its representatives to cancel their scheduled appearances with any representative of the RJC. Former Congressman Mel Levine (CA) yesterday informed the Valley Cities Jewish Community Center that he would no longer show up for his scheduled debate this Sunday against RJC California Director Larry Greenfield. State Representative Josh Shapiro (PA) informed Temple Sinai that he would not participate in a forum with RJC Philadelphia Director Scott Feigelstein.

"The RJC is deeply troubled by this effort on the part of the Obama campaign to stifle and limit a debate on the important issues facing our country," said Brooks. "More than anything the Jewish community values dialogue. What is the Obama campaign afraid of? Why is the Obama campaign afraid to have this conversation?"

"With their recently enacted policy of not debating representatives of the RJC, the Obama campaign has underscored Senator Obama's problems in the Jewish community. It is unfortunate that the Obama campaign is unwilling and afraid to have a candid conversation in the Jewish community on the issues of great concern to Jewish voters," said Brooks.

"Throughout this campaign, the RJC has highlighted the truth about Obama's positions, his statements and his advisers. Every point raised in our ads is sourced, cited and has previously been reported in the media. We ask legitimate questions about Obama's policies towards Israel, the Middle East and Iran. Our ads have raised legitimate concerns over Obama's associations with Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Robert Malley, Tony McPeak and David Bonior. If the Obama campaign is unhappy with our ads, then Senator Obama should never have associated with these individuals in the first place," Brooks added.

"Currently, the RJC is scheduled to participate in 29 debates between now and the election. In keeping with the long-standing tradition of Jewish dialogue, we look forward to these opportunities to engage the Jewish community on the critical issues," said Brooks.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama's Shifting Views on Jerusalem Are Reckless

The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) has released the latest in an ongoing series of national advertisements. These ads are part of a substantial advertising campaign undertaken by the RJC.

The new ad highlights the Sen. Barack Obama's flip-flop on Jerusalem:
On Wednesday, Sen. Barack Obama supported an undivided Jerusalem.

On Thursday, he did not.

At the annual AIPAC Policy Conference, Sen. Obama said Jerusalem should be the undivided capital of Israel. (Haaretz.com, June 5, 2008)

The very next day, Barack Obama changed his tune.

Facing criticism from the Palestinian Authority and Arab nations, Sen. Barack Obama said the future of Jerusalem would have to be negotiated by Israel and the Palestinians. (WashingtonPost.com, June 6, 2008)

In just twenty-four hours, Sen. Obama changed his position on this issue of critical importance to Israel and to Jews all over the world. Obama called his support for an undivided Jerusalem a "poor phrasing" of words. (Jerusalem Post, July 14, 2008)

Obama is a gifted public speaker. He knows that words matter. The Palestinians and the Arab nations are listening to Obama's words. So must we.

Barack Obama should know Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. It must remain undivided. Undivided, not just on Wednesdays, but every day.
 
RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks said, "One issue which unites the vast majority of the American Jewish community is that Jerusalem is and must remain 'the undivided capital of Israel.' Senator Obama is a savvy politician and a careful speaker. To use such a meaningful phrase in speaking to a Jewish audience and then backtrack on the issue casts doubt on the sincerity of his original words."

"Not only does this flip-flop raise concern in the Jewish community about Obama's position on Jerusalem," said Brooks, "it raises a serious question whether, if Obama were to become president, American foreign policy would shift from day to day in a manner that would harm our security and our interests abroad. Our alliances with good friends like Israel, and our policies with regard to states that pose a threat to the U.S., would be compromised by the kind of reckless changes in position that Obama demonstrated in his remarks on Jerusalem."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Will Sit Down with Ahmadenijad But Not RJC

Obama Pressures Philly Area Synagogue to Drop RJC Representative from a Scheduled Forum

The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) Executive Director Matt Brooks issued the following statement today:

"It has come to our attention that the Obama campaign has instituted a new policy of not debating representatives of the RJC at community candidates' forums. Forum organizers are being asked to provide surrogates not from the RJC. Temple Sinai, in suburban Philadelphia, was told that Obama surrogate state Rep. Josh Shapiro would not participate with RJC Philadelphia Director Scott Feigelstein. The synagogue was instructed to find someone else."
 
"This is not the first time the Obama campaign has made such a demand of Jewish forum organizers. We find it a curious paradox that Obama would engage Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad without preconditions, but the Obama campaign will not engage the RJC," said Brooks. "Given how troubling Senator Obama's record is on Israel, I guess he's afraid to have a fair debate."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jackson Confirms Jewish Community's Concerns About Obama

Says Obama will end clout of "Zionist controlled foreign policy"

Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) Executive Director Matt Brooks issued the following statement today on remarks made by Rev. Jesse Jackson:

"Jesse Jackson confirmed the Jewish communities long-standing concerns with Barack Obama's policies on Israel and the Middle East," said Brooks.

As reported by the New York Post, Jackson said at the World Policy Conference last week, that Obama would bring "fundamental changes" to US foreign policy in the Middle East. The Post also reported that Jackson said, "'decades of putting Israel's interests first would end. Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades would lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obama enters the White House."

Obama national campaign co-chairman Gen. Tony McPeak echoed Jackson's sentiments in a 2003 interview with The Oregonian. McPeak said progress had not been made in the Middle East peace process because of the Jewish community in New York City and Miami. "We have a large vote -- vote, here in favor of Israel. And no politician wants to run against it," said McPeak.

"That those with such virulent anti-Semitic and anti-Israel views support an Obama presidency continues to be deeply troubling to the Jewish community. It highlights why Obama continues to have problems in the Jewish community," said Brooks.
 
An article on this issue was recently published in the New York Post.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ahmadinejad: Says Israel Won't Survive

Obama Says He'd Meet Him Personally

The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) today released the latest in an ongoing series of national advertisements. These ads are part of a substantial advertising campaign undertaken by the RJC.

The new ad examines the record of anti-Israel statements by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Sen. Barack Obama's stated willingness to meet personally with the Iranian dictator.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad lashed out at Israel recently, saying the Jewish state would not survive.(1)

The Iranian president repeated his previous anti-Israel comments, calling the Holocaust by Nazi Germany during World War II a fabrication and saying that Israel is perpetrating a holocaust on the Palestinian people.(2)

Barack Obama? He says he's willing to meet with Ahmadinejad without any preconditions.

Ahmadinejad said, in 2005, that he believed Israel should be "wiped off the map"(3) and later called the Holocaust "a myth."(4) Most recently, he described the Jewish state as a "germ of corruption" that will be "removed soon."(5)

Obama? He called Iran a "tiny" country that doesn't "pose a serious threat to us the way the Soviet Union posed a threat to us."(6) And Sen. Obama is opposed to critical legislation labeling Iran's Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization.(7)

Should we be surprised about Obama's positions? Obama surrounds himself with anti-Israel advisors like General Tony McPeak, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Robert Malley. And his spiritual mentor was anti-American, anti-Semite Rev. Jeremiah Wright.(8)

Barack Obama has not shown the wisdom, experience or strength to stand up to the radicals who would do us harm.

RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks said, "Sen. Barack Obama comes to the national stage with a fundamental lack of experience and a naive world view which is most particularly evident with regard to the Middle East and Israel. His perspectives on Iran and on how the U.S. should deal with Iran are causes for real concern."

"Iran is a near-nuclear rogue state that is the chief state sponsor of international terrorism and a significant threat to U.S. interests and allies in Europe and the Middle East. Obama's willingness to meet with the Iranian president and to downplay the threat posed by Iran demonstrate a profound lack of the experience, wisdom, and strength our next president will need to guide our country in the dangerous years ahead." said Brooks.

Click here to see the ad.
 
 
(1) AP, 9/18/08; (2) Haaretz.com, 9/18/08; (3) IRIB News, 10/26/05; (4) CNN.com, 12/14/05; (5) AP, 8/20/08; (6) Obama speech, Pendleton (OR), 5/18/08; (7) Obama press release, 9/26/07; (8) Chicago Tribune, 2/11/08
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If the Jewish Left Wins, Jews and Israel Lose

by Dennis Prager

For decades most of the organized left has fought against Republicans and conservatives more than against the world's greatest evils. During the Cold War, starting in the late 1960s, one heard little if anything from the left about the evils of Communism or of Communist societies such as the Soviet Union or Communist China. But one heard a great deal about the evils of American anti-Communists; Ronald Reagan was vilified much more than Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev.

But last week, a new line seems to have been crossed. The organized Jewish left -- i.e., left-wing Jewish organizations that claim to be committed to the welfare of Jews -- made it clear that even in the fight against the greatest enemy of the Jewish people, the Jewish left prefers to fight what it considers an even greater enemy -- conservatives and Republicans.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, who has repeatedly called for the annihilation of Israel and who denies the Holocaust, came to speak at the United Nations. The day before he was scheduled to speak, Jewish organizations across the religious and political spectrum had organized a "Stop Iran" rally at the Dag Hammarskjold Plaza across from the UN. They had invited Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and then invited Republican vice-presidential nominee Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

The intent was to maximize publicity for the anti-Iran cause, the most important Jewish concern (and arguably the most important world concern) today. With Clinton and Palin present, the world press would cover the anti-Iran rally, and the Jewish community could show the world and America that this was one cause that knew no politics -- the most prominent female Democrat and the most prominent female Republican would both lend their names and prestige to this rally.

However, the moment that Clinton learned that the organizers had invited Palin, she withdrew. For Clinton, giving the other most popular woman politician in America publicity was unacceptable -- even among New York Jews, one of the steadfast liberal and Democratic groups in America. The near collapse of the Stop Iran rally was of less consequence to Clinton than denying Palin a public platform.

Not many were surprised by Clinton's action. What was alarming was the realization that for much of the Jewish left -- not leftists who happen to be Jews and for whom the welfare of the Jewish people is not particularly significant, but left-wing Jews who claim to care deeply about Jewish survival -- fighting Palin is of greater importance than fighting Ahmadinejad.

Left-wing Jews and Jewish organizations put intense pressure on the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations to cancel the invitation to Palin. And the pressure worked.

As the liberal editorial page of New York's major Jewish newspaper The Jewish Week put it:

"But somehow, a big-tent cause like Iran as a terrorist power seeking nuclear arms has become so politicized within our community that Monday's rally was more about the non-presence of Gov. Sarah Palin than about the very real presence at the UN of a Holocaust denier whose goal is to destroy our way of life."

Yet, in a rare move, publishing an entire speech that was never given, Ha'aretz, Israel's equivalent to The New York Times in its prestige and in its liberal politics, published the speech that Palin would have given. In Israel, liberal and even many left-wing Jews know that Iran is a greater threat to Israel than American conservatives.

The Palin speech was so good it should be read by every American concerned with Israel's survival. And it was so nonpartisan that it praised Clinton for being at the rally. To say that Palin -- who has the American, Alaskan and Israeli flags in her Juneau office -- is a better friend of the Jews and Israel than much of the American Jewish left sounds odd only to Jewish leftists.

But the Jewish left acts as if it fears and hates her more than it fears and hates Ahmadinejad. That is why within days of her nomination Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Fla., announced that "John McCain's decision to select a vice presidential running mate that endorsed Pat Buchanan for president in 2000 is a direct affront to all Jewish Americans. Pat Buchanan is a Nazi sympathizer with a uniquely atrocious record on Israel. … It is frightening that John McCain would select someone one heartbeat away from the presidency who supported a man who embodies vitriolic anti-Israel sentiments."

Wexler's statement was false: Palin supported Steve Forbes, not Buchanan. And associating Palin with Nazi or anti-Israel sympathies is morally loathsome, not to mention weakens the struggle against real anti-Semites.

For left-wing Jewish organizations and their supporters -- as opposed to many rank and file liberal Jews -- the real fight is against Republicans and especially Christian conservatives (as a community, the Jews' best friends) more than against a nuclear Iran.

After the cancellation of Palin, a left-wing Jewish organization that was influential in opposing Palin's appearance, an organization called J Street, on whose Board of Advisors sits the executive director of MoveOn.org, headlined on its website: "We Won!"

That is indeed the case. The Jewish left did win. Which is why the Jews and Israel lost.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Advisor Calls for Military Invasion of Israel

Samantha Power of the Kennedy School of Government and a Obama advisor has called for a military invasion of Israel in order to create a Palestinan State.

Samantha Power is one of Barack Obama's closest advisors. She worked in his U.S. Senate office (only 14 people shared this role). She tells her followers that she communicates with Obama a few times a day. She was forced to resign from the campaign advisory team after she called Hillary Clinton a "horror".
 
But here she is on tape calling Israel a state like others which commit genocide (e.g. Rwanda),and and recommending the use of International forces to take over the West Bank. She also wants all foreign aid to Israel ended, and instead sent to the Palestinians.
 
Powers is telling people she will have an important role in an Obama administration (UN Ambassador perhaps?),which the Obama campaign team has not denied. All of the Jewish voters who received the video email saying how much Obama loves the Jews and Israel, should view this.
 
Ms Powers is not just some distant associate or advisor to Obama , but she is very close to the real power behind Obama. She will have Obama's ear if he wins, and that happens, look for Israel's influence with the U.S. to be dramatically diminished in favor of the Palestinians.
 
Can anyone say "Second Carter Administration"?
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Hits Wall with Jewish Vote

A new survey from the American Jewish Committee shows Barack Obama still hovering around 60 percent among Jewish voters. His big problem: the undecideds.The survey shows Barack Obama underperforming among Jewish voters, a score consistent with two other major polls taken since May.

"This poll is just another data point in an ongoing series of polls that underscores the tremendous problems Barack Obama has among Jewish voters," Republican Jewish Coalition Executive Director Matt Brooks said.

The RJC's ads in Jewish newspapers in swing states where Jews may make a difference -- particularly Florida, Pennsylvania and Ohio -- have raised substantive questions about Obama. Brooks cited Obama's dangerous Iran policy and his bungled efforts to explain his views on Jerusalem -- and Brooks predicted bigger gains come Election Day.
 
In addition, many Jewish voters have unanswered concerns regarding Obama's ties to a radical pro-Palestinian sympathetizer, Mahmoud Al-Khaledi, who served with Obama on the Woods Foundation in Chicago, and identified in the book, The Obama Nation, by Jerome Corsi. In the book Corsi references Al-Khaledi links to the radical Islamic website, The Electronic Intifada, designed to promote anti-Israeli, and anti-Semitic sentiments against both Jews and Israelis.
 
In addition, many Jews have been uncomfortable since learning about Obama's 20+ year relationship with Rev. Jeremiah Wright, (someone who Obama has referred to as his "spiritual advisor") that gave a Lifetime Acheivement Award on behalf of the Trinity United Church to Louis Farrakhan, a affirmed anti-Semite.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive